Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brenda Tjaden's avatar

That's a great question and thank you for commenting. I first picked up on this reading The Third Plate by Dan Barber in 2018. Since then I attended a deeper dive at the Grain Gathering workshop in Montreal, and continue to follow the work of the Grain Lab and the Wheat and Small Grains research coming out of Washington State University. I also sent samples myself to the National Research Council lab in Saskatoon for a comparison of flour from AC Barrie and Einkorn, both from organic fields, grown in 2020 in Manitoba, and in consultation with the PhD scientist who analyzed them, found statistically significantly higher micronutrient levels in the einkorn flour.

Expand full comment
Greg Sundquist's avatar

What proof do you have for " Modern grains were bred for yield and harvestability. Improving those traits involved sacrificing nutrient density and as a result, today’s mainstream rice, bread, oatmeal and pasta are lacking some micronutrients and trace minerals that are essential in human nutrition." See this a lot and a lot of organic sites state something similar. This site says "WINNIPEG, May 29, 2015 /CNW/ - New research published in the peer reviewed journal Cereal Chemistry and additional results presented at the Canadian Nutrition Society annual meeting (May 28 – 30, 2015) in Winnipeg, Manitoba shows that the nutritional composition of modern wheat is similar to wheat grown in Canada 150 years ago." Who do I believe. Please provide proof about the lacking of micronutrients and trace minerals. Thanks.

Expand full comment

No posts